PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.50%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.51%
D&A growth of 3.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
21.57%
Deferred tax growth of 21.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
3.10%
SBC growth of 3.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-1428.57%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-889.29%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-14550.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
581.82%
AP growth of 581.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
250.96%
Growth of 250.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-75.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-36.82%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-9.32%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.21%
Purchases growth of 7.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
915.44%
Proceeds growth of 915.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
80.31%
Growth of 80.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
77.33%
Investing flow of 77.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.92%
Buyback growth of 89.92% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.