PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-30.39%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
16.67%
D&A growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
87.83%
Deferred tax growth of 87.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
13.38%
SBC growth of 13.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-77.65%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-77.08%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
198.08%
Inventory growth of 198.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
65.74%
AP growth of 65.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-164.16%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
80.00%
Growth of 80.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-19.82%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
36.95%
CapEx growth of 36.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.96%
Purchases growth of 39.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
75.53%
Proceeds growth of 75.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
567.90%
Growth of 567.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
3637.50%
Investing flow of 3637.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.86%
Buyback growth of 70.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.