176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.17%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
277.57%
D&A growth of 277.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-600.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
66.96%
SBC growth of 66.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
171.31%
Working capital of 171.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
117.67%
AR growth of 117.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
135.76%
Inventory growth of 135.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-111.27%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
653.33%
Growth of 653.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-325.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
72.39%
CFO growth of 72.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-40.00%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-20891.18%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-756.52%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
128900.00%
Proceeds growth of 128900.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-608.55%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-1178.67%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
99.84%
Debt repayment growth of 99.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.