PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
114.79%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-25.99%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
33.75%
Deferred tax growth of 33.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
2.41%
SBC growth of 2.41% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-368.75%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-1152.27%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-272.22%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
2912.50%
AP growth of 2912.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-315.06%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
122.22%
Growth of 122.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-18.38%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-117.97%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
81.04%
Acquisition growth of 81.04% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
38.72%
Purchases growth of 38.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
239.22%
Proceeds growth of 239.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
97.15%
Growth of 97.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
85.17%
Investing flow of 85.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.