PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.88%
Net income growth of 21.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
3.69%
D&A growth of 3.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-971.43%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-1.43%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
61.66%
Working capital of 61.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-89.07%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-216.95%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-6.15%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
113.77%
Growth of 113.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
840.00%
Growth of 840.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
99.67%
CFO growth of 99.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-23.53%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
70.44%
Acquisition growth of 70.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-29.66%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
173.00%
Proceeds growth of 173.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
41.18%
Growth of 41.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
64.24%
Investing flow of 64.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.32%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-41.69%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.