PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-59.46%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
13.17%
D&A growth of 13.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
18.27%
Deferred tax growth of 18.27% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
12.11%
SBC growth of 12.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
101.76%
Working capital of 101.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
115.23%
AR growth of 115.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-29.46%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
19.22%
AP growth of 19.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
159.25%
Growth of 159.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-99.86%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-26.63%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-19.94%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
63.89%
Acquisition growth of 63.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
7.39%
Purchases growth of 7.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-17.75%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
14.29%
Growth of 14.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-38.06%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.59%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.