PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.54%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
5.61%
D&A growth of 5.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-7.74%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
14.05%
SBC growth of 14.05% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-299.04%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
25.32%
Slight AR growth while Technology median is negative at -17.05%. Peter Lynch would question if peers more aggressively collect or if this firm invests in growth.
-39.17%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
3840.91%
AP growth of 3840.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-97.71%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-107.38%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -24.18%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-5.58%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -8.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-164.77%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-612.82%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
39.14%
Purchases growth of 39.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-1.06%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
94.44%
Growth of 94.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
44.07%
Investing flow of 44.07% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
Buyback growth of 7.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.