176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.36%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
27.92%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
58.95%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.05%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
58.95%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.05%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
58.21%
Net income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 97.24%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
60.00%
EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 95.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 114.75%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
5.47%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.91%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.47%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.13%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
418.18%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.14%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
196.36%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.35%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 29.02%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
39.29%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 13.63%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
17.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 8.23%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.08%
50-75% of AMD's 17.67%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
3.45%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
14.81%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 4.57%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
14.81%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.