PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.37%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
30.96%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
37.75%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.75%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.74%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
27.59%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.77%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.33%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.52%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-32.08%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 16429.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.15%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
221.37%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 18.29%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
28.36%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 7.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.76%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 8.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-63.33%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
24.19%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
33.33%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 13.26%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.