PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.64%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.58%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
22.90%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
22.90%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
25.25%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.00%
EPS growth of 50.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 25.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-15.63%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
3.57%
Diluted share change of 3.57% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.49%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-11.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
93.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 120.58%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
93.17%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 92.34%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
93.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 99.27%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
188.68%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 211.24%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
188.68%
Below 50% of AMD's 626.57%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
188.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 716.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
168.12%
Below 50% of AMD's 1412.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
168.12%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 334.02%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
168.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AMD's 280.51%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
95.63%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 160.63%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
95.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 35.97%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
95.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 51.13%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
AR growth well above AMD's 10.03%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
46.92%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 3.23%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
121.35%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.54%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
54.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.31%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-24.33%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 21.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
15.78%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.31%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.