PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.76%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.50%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
13.53%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
13.53%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.16%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-41.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-40.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
103.97%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 5.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
104.39%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
126.49%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
418.36%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-5.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 64.24%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-5.67%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 77.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 59.20%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
414.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
414.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
414.93%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
45.15%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
45.15%
Below 50% of AMD's 141.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
45.15%
Below 50% of AMD's 122.85%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
7.87%
Below 50% of AMD's 185.97%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
7.87%
Below 50% of AMD's 50.35%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.87%
Below 50% of AMD's 68.54%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.19%
AR growth well above AMD's 20.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
23.34%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 13.03%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.26%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-37.80%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-28.87%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
12.96%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 8.46%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
20.55%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 4.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.