PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.12%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 24.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
12.17%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 78.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.58%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 87.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.58%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 92.45%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.66%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 91.53%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-11.11%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
6.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
22.61%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.61%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.14%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 52.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-92.82%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 72.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
57.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 39.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
57.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 65.32%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
57.80%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.25%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
172.15%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
172.15%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
172.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
97.53%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
97.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 35.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
97.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
202.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 144.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
202.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 51.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
202.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 50.24%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 12.10%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-3.53%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.36%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.46%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.12%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 1.63%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
20.07%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
13.57%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 8.46%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.