PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.41%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.96%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-19.51%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 21.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.51%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 21.92%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.72%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 42.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-14.34%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
2.39%
Diluted share change of 2.39% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.66%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 88.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
392.13%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 145.07%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
186.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 18.82%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
186.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 40.74%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
186.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 22.30%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
786.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
786.36%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 57.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
786.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to AMD's 724.25%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
246.81%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
246.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
246.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 93.89%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
410.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 114.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
410.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 47.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
410.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 60.39%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.49%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 4.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-3.49%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
6.43%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 5.63%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
33.31%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.08%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 38.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
18.01%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 6.84%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.29%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.