PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
42.26%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
33.62%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 29.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
37.12%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.12%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
33.01%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.51%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.29%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.08%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.51%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 13.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-105.20%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
212.15%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
212.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
212.15%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
51.59%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
51.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
51.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
244.57%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
244.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
244.57%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
407.50%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 75.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
407.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 31.15%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
407.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 45.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
34.46%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 10.56%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.88%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
14.02%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.72%
Debt growth far above AMD's 2.96%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
31.33%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 23.84%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
25.17%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.