PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.52%
Revenue growth similar to AMD's 35.06%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
33.80%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 230.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
65.60%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 20.22%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
65.60%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
63.05%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.00%
EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
80.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of AMD's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
23.13%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
4.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.65%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
144.30%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-1960.10%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 18.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
228.72%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
228.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
228.72%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
660.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
660.31%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
660.31%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
322.69%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
322.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
322.69%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
419.51%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 26.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
419.51%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
419.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 9.79%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.23%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
77.51%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 2.94%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
20.51%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.59%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.39%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 25.01%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.32%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 10.81%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
36.46%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 22.59%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.