PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.70%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-52.07%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-94.74%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-94.74%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 1.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-93.69%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 4.28%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-93.48%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-92.31%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.07%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.38%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-7.56%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.63%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 81.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-198.48%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 54.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
301.46%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
301.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
301.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
114.83%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
114.83%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
114.83%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-42.53%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-42.53%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-42.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
684.85%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 0.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
684.85%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
684.85%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.14%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
12.37%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 6.21%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.96%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.64%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.51%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
9.02%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 2.68%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-4.20%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.