PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.71%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 47.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.96%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 48.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-912.75%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 69.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-912.75%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 75.52%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1025.69%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 77.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-966.67%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 77.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-966.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 77.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.68%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.29%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-9.15%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13562.28%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 100.01%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
420.66%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
240.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 24.27%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
240.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 14.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
240.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
567.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
567.31%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
567.31%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-452.26%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-452.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-452.26%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
586.03%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
586.03%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
586.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.65%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 54.46%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-28.14%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 48.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.90%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 25.89%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.15%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 30.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.51%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 25.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
0.96%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 2.63%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
7.76%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 11.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.