PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.64%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-21.56%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 9.48%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-62.75%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 62.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-62.75%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 33.77%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-61.23%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-60.00%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-60.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.32%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.48%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-87.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
320.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 32.02%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
320.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 62.60%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
117.89%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
777.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 0.45%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
777.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 683.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
203.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 25.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
131.30%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
131.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 129.18%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-13.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
824.39%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
824.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 8.63%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
372.52%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.81%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 9.83%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
14.30%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.36%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.80%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
3.38%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-56.97%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.