PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.53%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
2.69%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 2.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
-6.51%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 22.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.51%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 18.20%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
22.30%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.92%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.66%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.95%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.50%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.46%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 23.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-419.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
310.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 30.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
310.99%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
335.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 19.55%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
497.51%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
497.51%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 367.11%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
26.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 245.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
151.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
151.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
73.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 73.11%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
741.63%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
741.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
680.22%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.13%
AR growth well above AMD's 11.23%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
31.41%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 4.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.49%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.09%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.70%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.57%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.11%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.64%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.90%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.