PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.72%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.20%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 4.73%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-37.64%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-73.68%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 36.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-76.92%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.89%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.45%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.85%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-145.79%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 3.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
32.57%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
265.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 25.62%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
265.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 55.55%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
100.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 57.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-159.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-159.80%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 455.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-139.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 249.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-56.29%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-56.29%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 134.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-81.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 122.78%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
647.93%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
647.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 11.37%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
128.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 6.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
19.72%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 11.16%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-18.05%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.49%
Under 50% of AMD's 3.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-97.28%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 2.42%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
11.33%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 2.70%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.28%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 12.95%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.