PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.05%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
7.69%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.27%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.27%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-11.66%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 41.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.08%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.27%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 4.73%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
10.51%
Diluted share change of 10.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6579.03%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
422.34%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
371.01%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1.67%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
371.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
64.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 17.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1181.54%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1181.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
44.58%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 3.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
140.14%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
140.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-30.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
903.49%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
903.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.48%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
96.68%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.41%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.24%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.21%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.03%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-30.45%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
8.00%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.14%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.34%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.