PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.87%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 17.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-84.09%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 84.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-84.09%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 84.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-76.02%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 164.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-72.73%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 175.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-70.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 175.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.65%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.59%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.59%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 3.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.99%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 5.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-206.14%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 85.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
292.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 9.06%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
292.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
49.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 81.41%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-487.74%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-487.74%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-142.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 312.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-48.71%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-48.71%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-87.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 105.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
791.18%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
791.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
77.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.01%
AR growth well above AMD's 5.35%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.71%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 7.68%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.56%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.18%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-39.85%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
9.86%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 7.69%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
7.77%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 7.93%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50