PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.87%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 20.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
16.24%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 36.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
98.75%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AMD's 161.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
98.75%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 161.30%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
85.51%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 25.77%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
76.92%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
76.92%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
6.88%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 16.30%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
2.71%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 11.64%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22750.46%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 25.21%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
696.01%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 211.63%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
273.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 84.89%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
273.40%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 5.96%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
13.59%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 97.71%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
1483.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 143.63%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1483.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 45.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
108.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 504.47%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
178.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.57% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
178.31%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-34.16%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 108.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
700.35%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
700.35%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
54.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 0.29%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.62%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 10.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.04%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.77%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.54%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-37.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.35%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 13.94%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 22.56%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.