PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.07%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.43%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.29%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 25.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
33.29%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 25.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
34.23%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 93.54%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
39.13%
EPS growth of 39.13% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
30.43%
Diluted EPS growth of 30.43% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-4.97%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.70%
Diluted share change of 1.70% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.67%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 5.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-6.30%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 23.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
470.73%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 46.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
195.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-10.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 38.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1728.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 1476.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
533.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 161.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
64.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 635.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
609.96%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 335.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
164.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 0.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-30.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 193.97%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1013.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 32.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
469.21%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
26.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 48.25%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.46%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.40%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 10.49%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
9.90%
Under 50% of AMD's 38.13%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
902.10%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.21%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-8.64%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.