PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.60%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 33.54%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.73%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
57.04%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
57.04%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
50.26%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
37.50%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
46.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
9.35%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 9.88%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.42%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 10.46%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 18.00%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
185.90%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
298.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 96.11%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
152.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 18.63%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
21.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3335.25%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1162.24%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 55.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
63.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
442.52%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
174.65%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
73.45%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
845.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 57.26%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
212.61%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 3.64%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
40.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 56.09%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 62.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.55%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 74.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.08%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 56.90%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.21%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 4.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.12%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 38.72%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-8.02%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 0.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.