PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.61%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.26%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-10.38%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.38%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-7.52%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.27%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-6.44%
Share reduction while AMD is at 2.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
4.98%
Diluted share change of 4.98% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.64%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-85.28%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
546.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 19.42%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
125.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
53.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
897.28%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
12.51%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
13.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
868.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
179.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
318.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1311.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 36.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
176.58%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
52.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 35.93%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.97%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
35.94%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 15.23%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
12.85%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
17.94%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.42%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 12.27%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
30.91%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 16.07%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.