PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.84%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 11.76%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.17%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 32.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-4.84%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 9.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.84%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 9.33%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.33%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 1.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.33%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 1.80%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 1.80%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.66%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.55%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-1.22%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-110.46%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
461.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 24.21%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
113.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 42.13%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
36.69%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
428.36%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-76.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-17.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
725.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
109.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
228.36%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1178.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 14.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
153.95%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
51.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 13.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
9.32%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 4.03%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.18%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.96%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 9.95%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
5.16%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 8.96%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.