PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.35%
Revenue growth similar to AMD's 18.43%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
14.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 45.12%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
22.75%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 60.39%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
22.75%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 50.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
22.78%
Net income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 34.00%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
19.05%
EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 34.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
21.62%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 34.86%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.64%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.36%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.39%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.36%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1601.67%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 135.12%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
8479.93%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 81.32%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
465.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 39.95%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
81.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 98.69%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
54.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1740.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 384.28%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1114.11%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 247.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
3177.45%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
571.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
94.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 3.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1435.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1152.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 3.28%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
146.87%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
67.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2.87%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.43%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 5.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.35%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
15.90%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.85%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.59%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
9.47%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.