PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.10%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of AMD's 8.46%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
15.50%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of AMD's 17.34%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
17.77%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.77%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
53.51%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
36.00%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
51.11%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of AMD's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
8.15%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 4.51%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.06%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 9.39%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-40.62%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
439.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 39.55%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
64.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 52.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
57.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3325.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
350.56%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 136.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
20671.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
782.52%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
108.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
473.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1169.28%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
144.32%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
61.77%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.08%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-5.05%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.69%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.54%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
15.31%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 1.28%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
12.33%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.