PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.94%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.44%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.97%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 86.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.97%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 84.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-19.11%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 79.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-11.76%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-19.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.34%
Share reduction while AMD is at 4.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.03%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.03%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
73.79%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
671.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 30.87%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
20.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 19.91%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
63.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5748.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 134.87%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
424.82%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 111.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
356.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1262.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
32.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
467.16%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1672.84%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
101.52%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
76.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.09%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-6.22%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.70%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.33%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.44%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 5.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.12%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 6.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.