PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.78%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.54%
Gross profit growth similar to AMD's 10.83%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
30.81%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
30.81%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 45.83%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
30.60%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.91%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.12%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.17%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.92%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.97%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
633.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 18.55%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 19.28%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
86.88%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
6238.44%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
41278.76%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1144.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1477.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2644.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
2975.01%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1576.12%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
113.56%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
88.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.83%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-16.93%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.40%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.65%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
0.88%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.