PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.28%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 31.65%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
21.59%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 30.03%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
34.14%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 119.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
34.14%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 191.61%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
36.43%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 88.79%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
41.03%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 88.83%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
31.94%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 88.83%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.40%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.52%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.16%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.80%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 10.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
9.76%
FCF growth 50-75% of AMD's 14.37%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
631.87%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 21.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
114.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 6.38%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
94.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2203.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
245.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
78514.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1314.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
501.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
717.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1502.49%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
133.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
100.66%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.65%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 41.88%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
10.80%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 6.70%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
14.46%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.12%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.49%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.