PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.81%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.60%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.91%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.91%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.05%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.09%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
26.32%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.58%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-44.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
660.55%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
132.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
103.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3767.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
83.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
144.23%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1329.20%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
356.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
413.54%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1605.93%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
154.20%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
113.15%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.65%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
17.11%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.84%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.65%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.08%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 25.36%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.49%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 2.24%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.