PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.56%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 17.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
145.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 32.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
136.55%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 89.03%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
136.55%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 69.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
151.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 65.81%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
151.85%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 63.27%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
151.85%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 63.27%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-2.09%
Share reduction while AMD is at 4.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.64%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 4.05%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.88%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-340.52%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 6.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
500.98%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
64.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
44.33%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
165.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
544.73%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-52.03%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
278.30%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 57.26% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
765.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-11.23%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1541.41%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
119.46%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
72.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 56.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
21.22%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 4.46%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-7.86%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 0.74%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.61%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.26%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-2.22%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.