PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-46.40%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 17.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-61.49%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 25.64%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-408.27%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 5138.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-408.27%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 1772.73%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-339.14%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 1232.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-346.43%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-342.86%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.13%
Share reduction while AMD is at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.67%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 8.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.15%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 909.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
4.83%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 508.79%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
214.06%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-8.16%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-21.22%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-413.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 44.66%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1784.49%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 68.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-109.14%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 219.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-947.67%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is at 687.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-650.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 2226.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-256.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 257.95%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1510.75%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
105.29%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
70.43%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.61%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 30.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 10.10%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-8.17%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.61%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 233.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.27%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 2.86%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.33%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.