PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.05%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
33.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-31.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-36.35%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-36.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.87%
Share change of 0.87% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.28%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
816.19%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
293.17%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
505.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
28.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-6.24%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2606.74%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
171.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-2169.33%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-961.70%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 920.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-313.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 132.66%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1857.62%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
95.08%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
38.73%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-39.15%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 1.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.13%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
42.51%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
37.51%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 121.83%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.