PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.91%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-17.38%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
52.33%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
52.33%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
47.70%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
48.39%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
48.39%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.80%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.28%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.80%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.93%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3.21%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
509.80%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
55.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
8.55%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2607.97%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
526.71%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
663.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 87.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-1062.70%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-1976.89%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-216.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 94.42%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1568.61%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
87.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.55%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.63%
AR growth well above AMD's 7.41%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-14.68%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.77%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.85%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.15%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-36.10%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 14.86%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-37.77%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 4.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.