PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.31%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
149.98%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
197.95%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
197.95%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
202.16%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
204.17%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
200.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.85%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.56%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.08%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.56%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.59%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
6.18%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
496.50%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
58.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
5.57%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
762.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
29321.27%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-53.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
550.14%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
275.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-3.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 76.85%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1477.85%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
97.57%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
25.94%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.03%
AR growth well above AMD's 5.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-0.56%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.01%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.93%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
2.64%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
16.24%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 3.06%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.