PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.78%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.98%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.51%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 243.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
24.51%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 222.66%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
21.84%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 417.80%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.00%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
18.75%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.23%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.98%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 7.15%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-62.58%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
517.81%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
65.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
14.54%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
954.88%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-33.39%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-69.21%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
624.87%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
160.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 152.87%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-17.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 117.02%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1627.00%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
115.78%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
36.06%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.75%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 26.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
19.10%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 1.61%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.53%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 8.03%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
8.62%
Under 50% of AMD's 63.38%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-1.25%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 1.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
9.25%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.56%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 5.93%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.