PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.89%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.98%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
13.25%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
13.25%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
17.62%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.87%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.87%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.95%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.81%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.06%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
197.99%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
249.90%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
104.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 14.88%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
13.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
6.40%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
793.32%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-26.42%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
409.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
183.95%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 71.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
45.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 70.52%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
158.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
362.88%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
87.50%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
43.12%
Below 50% of AMD's 261.91%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.59%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-11.69%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.57%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.68%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.42%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.94%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.54%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-0.39%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.