PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.91%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.69%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
91.72%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 71.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
91.72%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 52.94%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
96.98%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 49.32%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
92.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 47.37%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
92.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 47.37%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.52%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.10%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2281.65%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 77.42%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
464.38%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 64.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
80.39%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-1.28%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
18.76%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
22097.04%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-46.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 88.14%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
31.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 65.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1572.42%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 75.28% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-39.06%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 94.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
199.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
272.06%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
74.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
75.00%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.31%
AR growth well above AMD's 3.88%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
12.98%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 15.99%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.22%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 2.63%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.34%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.85%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.95%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
12.44%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.