PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.31%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 25.84%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
17.74%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 13.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
80.64%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 437.93%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
80.64%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 404.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
75.63%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 164.86%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
77.08%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 160.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
72.92%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 160.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.54%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 8.11%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.92%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 1.60%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.66%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 160.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1.54%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 109.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
106.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-3.75%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
18.09%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 911651.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-57.43%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is at 107.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
13.76%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 115.09%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
417.74%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 166.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-20.89%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 127.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
72.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AMD's 136.25%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
297.00%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
69.96%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
72.61%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 30.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
10.80%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 29.68%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.11%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 10.78%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.47%
Under 50% of AMD's 11.82%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.01%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.06%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-16.38%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.