PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.07%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 8.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.02%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 6.14%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-27.22%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 36.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-27.22%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 19.18%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.79%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 85.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.65%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.66%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.35%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.09%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.51%
OCF growth of 148.51% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
194.77%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
91.29%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-17.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
1.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
193.99%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
59.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 106.72%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
486.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 109.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
176.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-39.42%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 105.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
19.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
319.49%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
65.02%
Below 50% of AMD's 630.55%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
63.01%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.09%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-2.17%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.55%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.46%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.58%
Under 50% of AMD's 32.12%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.20%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.87%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 1.74%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.75%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 9.03%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.