PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.05%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.38%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 18.41%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.35%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 67.72%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.35%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 50.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.66%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 48.22%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 48.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
12.82%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 48.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.66%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.29%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.98%
Dividend growth of 0.98% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
105.33%
OCF growth at 50-75% of AMD's 189.83%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
134.07%
FCF growth similar to AMD's 125.00%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
115.98%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
30.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
47.41%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
336.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
555.72%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 122.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
21.18%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 117.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
293.57%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
51.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
87.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 79.77%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
266.85%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
70.01%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.74%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
18.33%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.58%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.77%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.44%
Debt growth far above AMD's 0.09%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
2.40%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.50%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 0.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.