PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.96%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.66%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.85%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-23.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-30.62%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-31.82%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-31.82%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.89%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.05%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.25%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-1.35%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-44.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-47.53%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.68%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
18.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
39.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
153.08%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
4809.05%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 76.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
3096.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 73.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
91.62%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
0.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
148.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 28.18%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
241.19%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
64.54%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.19%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-9.30%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.24%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.22%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.40%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-2.66%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 5.68%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
14.80%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.