PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.17%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 23.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-2.91%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 18.59%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-56.82%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 308.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-56.82%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 78.87%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-80.60%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 163.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-78.33%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 164.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-78.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 157.14%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.46%
Share reduction while AMD is at 10.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.11%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 3.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
16.92%
Dividend growth of 16.92% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-33.74%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-35.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
87.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
50.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
26.33%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
222.52%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
402.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-7.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-67.45%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
119.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-75.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 180.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
207.45%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
60.50%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
7.51%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.97%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 32.09%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
0.68%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 10.07%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.28%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 11.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.78%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 25.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.50%
Debt growth far above AMD's 0.09%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-5.60%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
7.97%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 11.43%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.