PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.18%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 27.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
15.77%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 25.08%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
222.37%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
222.37%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 413.33%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
846.15%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
746.15%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
746.15%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.18%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.62%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.18%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
56.44%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 134.12%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
71.22%
FCF growth 50-75% of AMD's 118.87%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
110.53%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
64.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.45%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
185.38%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
28.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.34%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 36.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
254.82%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
208.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
35.10%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
211.42%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
64.12%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
8.56%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.28%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.63%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.79%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 9.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.49%
Under 50% of AMD's 199.02%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
0.43%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.81%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 6.58%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.01%
SG&A growth of 2.01% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.