PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.36%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.77%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.86%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 97.19%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
2.86%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.85%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 87.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.64%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 88.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 88.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.55%
Share reduction while AMD is at 11.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
4.96%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 14.23%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
15.73%
Dividend growth of 15.73% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
100.39%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 548.28%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
108.40%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 735.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
128.82%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
71.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
45.63%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
134.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
27.25%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
30.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 650.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
118.48%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 94.76%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
30.54%
Below 50% of AMD's 76.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
36.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
217.26%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
52.05%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.51%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.76% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.78%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.73%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.65%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.56%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 1.93%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.92%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 3.42%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.