PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.43%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.99%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
29.39%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
29.39%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.08%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 75.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
20.48%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 75.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.56%
Share reduction while AMD is at 14.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
5.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.64%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.56%
Dividend growth of 0.56% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-40.45%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 72.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.16%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 70.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
104.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
58.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
60.18%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
964.73%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 92.46%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
152.62%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
109.07%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
186.92%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 95.91% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
87.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
187.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 11.11%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
166.39%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
36.74%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.70%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.80% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
23.14%
AR growth well above AMD's 24.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
32.23%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.97%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.15%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.37%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.07%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.64%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.16%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 5.17%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.26%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 3.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.