PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.34%
Revenue growth similar to AMD's 37.62%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
43.22%
Gross profit growth similar to AMD's 47.93%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
101.58%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 3000.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
101.58%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 12000.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
114.23%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 245.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
108.33%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 450.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
110.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 450.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.75%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 7.58%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.49%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 10.26%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-2.34%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
148.91%
OCF growth at 75-90% of AMD's 180.49%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
176.32%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 134.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
140.01%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
112.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
105.29%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
55.57%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
111.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to AMD's 120.15%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
204.65%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to AMD's 206.56%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
400.09%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 108.39% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
243.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 128.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
392.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 200.00%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
183.48%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
51.19%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
33.04%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 51.76% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
29.35%
AR growth well above AMD's 25.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
30.33%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
28.83%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.41%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
17.96%
1.25-1.5x AMD's 15.91%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
101.92%
Debt growth far above AMD's 0.64%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
6.57%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 12.28%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.92%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 3.94%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.